The International Sovereignty Index quantifies external supplier concentration — inaugural release: EU-27 member states — using a Herfindahl-Hirschman framework applied to 6 strategic axes of external exposure.
This is not a risk score. It is a structural measurement — a precise rendering of how concentrated each nation’s external suppliers are, across energy, finance, defense, technology, critical inputs, and logistics.
Cohort Mean Axis Exposure
Composite ISI scores mapped across 27 member states. Click any country for full axis-level detail.
Countries exhibiting the most notable structural concentration patterns across the EU-27 cohort.
Highest Logistics Concentration
1.0000
Logistics axis HHI
Malta
Most concentrated logistics supplier structure in the cohort
Most Diversified
0.2357
Composite ISI
France
Lowest composite ISI — broadest structural spread
Largest Deviation from Mean
+0.1731
Δ from EU mean (0.3444)
Malta
Greatest distance from the cohort composite average
Most Uneven Profile
0.1242
Axis score variance
Malta
Highest axis-level variance — structural imbalance
Countries Scored
27 / 27
Cohort scope (EU-27)
Composite Mean
0.3444
Cohort average
Composite Median
0.3403
Cohort midpoint
Std Deviation
0.0699
Cross-EU dispersion
Range
0.2818
0.2357 → 0.5175
Aggregation
Unweighted Arithmetic Mean
ISI I = (A1 I + A2 I + A3 I + A4 I + A5 I + A6 I) / 6
Distribution of ISI composite scores across the current release cohort (EU-27). Vertical bands indicate HHI classification thresholds.
1
Highly Concentrated
23
Moderately Concentrated
3
Mildly Concentrated
0
Unconcentrated
The ISI measures external supplier concentration across 6 strategic axes using a Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) framework. Scores range from 0 (perfectly diversified) to 1 (total concentration on a single source).
≥ 0.50 — Highly Concentrated
Critical concentration on one or very few external suppliers.
0.25–0.49 — Moderately Concentrated
Significant concentration across a small number of sources.
0.15–0.24 — Mildly Concentrated
Moderate spread, but notable concentration remains.
< 0.15 — Unconcentrated
Broadly distributed across many external sources.
Sortable rankings across the current release cohort (EU-27).
27 of 27 countries
| # | Country | Composite | Rank | Δ Mean | Financial External Supplier Concentration | Energy External Supplier Concentration | Technology External Supplier Concentration | Defense External Supplier Concentration | Critical Inputs External Supplier Concentration | Logistics External Supplier Concentration | Classification |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MaltaMT | 0.5175 | 1/27 | +0.1731 | 0.1400 | 0.3507 | 0.2055 | 1.0000 | 0.4087 | 1.0000 | Highly Concentrated | |
| CyprusCY | 0.4682 | 2/27 | +0.1238 | 0.1241 | 0.3477 | 0.2244 | 0.7485 | 0.4236 | 0.9411 | Moderately Concentrated | |
| IrelandIE | 0.4280 | 3/27 | +0.0836 | 0.1467 | 0.4647 | 0.5870 | 0.4489 | 0.3072 | 0.6137 | Moderately Concentrated | |
| DenmarkDK | 0.4244 | 4/27 | +0.0800 | 0.1240 | 0.4703 | 0.1500 | 0.7237 | 0.4363 | 0.6423 | Moderately Concentrated | |
| CroatiaHR | 0.4043 | 5/27 | +0.0600 | 0.2730 | 0.3513 | 0.1734 | 0.7465 | 0.5239 | 0.3580 | Moderately Concentrated | |
| FinlandFI | 0.4021 | 6/27 | +0.0577 | 0.1178 | 0.3627 | 0.1979 | 0.3896 | 0.5470 | 0.7973 | Moderately Concentrated | |
| SwedenSE | 0.3987 | 7/27 | +0.0543 | 0.1165 | 0.3272 | 0.1198 | 0.8811 | 0.1926 | 0.7551 | Moderately Concentrated | |
| AustriaAT | 0.3825 | 8/27 | +0.0381 | 0.1490 | 0.4558 | 0.2606 | 0.5851 | 0.3186 | 0.5259 | Moderately Concentrated | |
| ItalyIT | 0.3739 | 9/27 | +0.0295 | 0.1875 | 0.3078 | 0.1410 | 0.9206 | 0.2084 | 0.4778 | Moderately Concentrated | |
| SloveniaSI | 0.3698 | 10/27 | +0.0254 | 0.1192 | 0.4054 | 0.3574 | 0.6666 | 0.2230 | 0.4471 | Moderately Concentrated | |
| GreeceEL | 0.3654 | 11/27 | +0.0210 | 0.2008 | 0.3354 | 0.1627 | 0.5515 | 0.2220 | 0.7198 | Moderately Concentrated | |
| LuxembourgLU | 0.3602 | 12/27 | +0.0158 | 0.1146 | 0.3598 | 0.2002 | 0.6448 | 0.2230 | 0.6186 | Moderately Concentrated | |
| EstoniaEE | 0.3433 | 13/27 | −0.0011 | 0.1817 | 0.4394 | 0.2271 | 0.3556 | 0.3862 | 0.4699 | Moderately Concentrated | |
| BulgariaBG | 0.3403 | 14/27 | −0.0041 | 0.1605 | 0.3571 | 0.1520 | 0.8606 | 0.1484 | 0.3629 | Moderately Concentrated | |
| NetherlandsNL | 0.3352 | 15/27 | −0.0092 | 0.1211 | 0.3199 | 0.1253 | 0.9596 | 0.1302 | 0.3549 | Moderately Concentrated | |
| HungaryHU | 0.3297 | 16/27 | −0.0147 | 0.1222 | 0.3858 | 0.2254 | 0.5447 | 0.2341 | 0.4658 | Moderately Concentrated | |
| PortugalPT | 0.3217 | 17/27 | −0.0227 | 0.1830 | 0.3486 | 0.1977 | 0.4338 | 0.2596 | 0.5078 | Moderately Concentrated | |
| RomaniaRO | 0.3186 | 18/27 | −0.0257 | 0.2003 | 0.4055 | 0.2969 | 0.5635 | 0.1581 | 0.2875 | Moderately Concentrated | |
| CzechiaCZ | 0.3180 | 19/27 | −0.0264 | 0.1612 | 0.3808 | 0.1824 | 0.4841 | 0.1698 | 0.5295 | Moderately Concentrated | |
| PolandPL | 0.2956 | 20/27 | −0.0488 | 0.1331 | 0.3349 | 0.2085 | 0.4433 | 0.1653 | 0.4886 | Moderately Concentrated | |
| BelgiumBE | 0.2880 | 21/27 | −0.0564 | 0.1535 | 0.3079 | 0.2945 | 0.4473 | 0.1725 | 0.3521 | Moderately Concentrated | |
| GermanyDE | 0.2679 | 22/27 | −0.0765 | 0.1019 | 0.3291 | 0.0976 | 0.5827 | 0.2231 | 0.2730 | Moderately Concentrated | |
| LithuaniaLT | 0.2654 | 23/27 | −0.0790 | 0.1335 | 0.3375 | 0.2417 | 0.4023 | 0.1306 | 0.3469 | Moderately Concentrated | |
| SpainES | 0.2609 | 24/27 | −0.0835 | 0.1455 | 0.3019 | 0.1926 | 0.3809 | 0.1124 | 0.4324 | Moderately Concentrated | |
| LatviaLV | 0.2470 | 25/27 | −0.0974 | 0.1232 | 0.3652 | 0.1331 | 0.3408 | 0.1512 | 0.3682 | Mildly Concentrated | |
| SlovakiaSK | 0.2364 | 26/27 | −0.1080 | 0.1616 | 0.4000 | 0.2165 | 0.0000 | 0.1549 | 0.4855 | Mildly Concentrated | |
| FranceFR | 0.2357 | 27/27 | −0.1087 | 0.1004 | 0.3091 | 0.1200 | 0.3703 | 0.1612 | 0.3529 | Mildly Concentrated |
Scores are Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) values on [0, 1]. Higher = more concentrated external supplier structure. Below-mean values indicate less concentration; above-mean values indicate more. Δ Mean shows deviation from the cohort composite average.
6 strategic axes of external supplier concentration, each composed of discrete data channels.
Axis 1
Concentration of inward banking claims and portfolio debt holdings across foreign creditor countries.
[Medium]BIS creditor coverage gap: non-BIS-reporting countries absent as creditors; concentration may be biased upward.
[Medium]IMF CPIS participation is voluntary; China does not participate. Portfolio debt concentration may understate true exposure.
[Low]Partial overlap between Channel A (bank claims) and Channel B (portfolio debt securities held by banks).
[Low]Croatia (HR) absent from Channel B (IMF CPIS). Score reduces to Channel A only.
Axis 2
Concentration of fossil fuel imports (gas, oil, solid fossil fuels) across supplier countries, volume-weighted across fuel types.
[Medium]Pipeline gas and LNG not separated. A country importing 50% pipeline gas from Russia and 50% LNG from multiple sources scores as if partially diversified.
[Medium]Re-exports and transit flows may distort bilateral attribution across all fuel types.
[Low]No price or contract-duration effects captured. Volume-based concentration only.
Axis 3
Concentration of semiconductor imports across supplier countries, with category-level decomposition.
[Medium]Re-export blindness: bilateral trade records shipping country, not country of origin.
[Low]Trade concentration does not capture domestic fabrication capacity.
[Low]HS 8542 at HS4 aggregate: integrated circuits not decomposed into subcategories.
[Low]Intra-EU trade included: EU partners appear as suppliers (by design).
[Low]Three-year window (2022–2024) may include pandemic-era distortions.
Axis 4
Concentration of major conventional arms imports across supplier countries and capability blocks.
[Medium]SIPRI TIV is a volume indicator, not a financial value. Comparability across weapon types is approximate.
[Medium]SIPRI covers major conventional weapons only. Small arms, ammunition, MRO, and sustainment contracts are excluded.
[Low]Six-year delivery window (2019–2024) may include legacy contracts not reflecting current strategic posture.
[Low]Regex-based weapon classification may cause edge-case misclassification across capability blocks.
[Low]Countries with no bilateral SIPRI supplier entries are assigned score=0 (zero external concentration). This reflects licensed production, joint EU procurement, or domestic manufacturing.
Axis 5
Concentration of critical raw material imports across supplier countries, with material-group decomposition.
[High]Re-export and entrepot masking: bilateral trade records shipping country, not origin. 13 of 27 reporters source >50% from EU partners.
[Medium]Small-economy amplification: CY, MT, LU produce mechanically high HHI values due to low total import volumes.
[Medium]CN8 scope covers upstream materials only. Midstream processing and downstream products excluded. China's role understated.
[Low]Confidential trade suppression: Q-prefix partner codes excluded. May cause underestimation for some partners.
Axis 6
Concentration of international freight across transport modes and bilateral freight partners per mode.
[High]Entrepot/hub masking: NL and BE scores understate their systemic importance as continental freight hubs; countries trading through NL/BE have inflated partner concentration masking true origin.
[Medium]Geographic determinism: MT (Channel A HHI = 1.0), CY, and landlocked countries have structurally constrained scores reflecting geography, not policy choices.
[Medium]Maritime-energy overlap: maritime tonnage includes energy commodity transport, creating partial redundancy with Axis 3 (Energy).
[Medium]Tonnage blindness: all freight is treated equally per tonne regardless of commodity type; strategic commodity differentiation is absent.
[Low]No route/chokepoint data: the axis cannot detect Suez, Bosporus, or any physical corridor dependency.
ISI Paper Series — methodological foundations, empirical results, and country-level analysis.
Drazsky, Sebastian, International Sovereignty Institute · March 2026
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18904016
View paper →Drazsky, Sebastian, International Sovereignty Institute · February 2026
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18818748
View paper →Drazsky, Sebastian, International Sovereignty Institute · February 2026
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18764170
View paper →Drazsky, Sebastian, International Sovereignty Institute · February 2026
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18764227
View paper →See Methodology and Transparency for full details.